BACK⇒ Return to Table of contents
إذا كان يوم القيامة، يكون أبو بكر على أحد أركان الحوض، وعمر على الثاني، وعثمان على الثالث، وعلي على الرابع، فمن أبغض واحدا منهم، لم يسقه الآخرون.
On the Day of Resurrection, Abu Bakr will be upon one of the pillars of the Hawd (Pond), ‘Umar will be on the second, ‘Uthman on the third, and ‘Ali on the fourth. Whoever shows hatred towards one of them, the other will not give him to drink.
This hadith is narrated from Ibn ‘Abbas, Anas, and Jabir radiya Llahu ‘anhum.
This version of the hadith has the following two chains of transmission:
Ibn Hibban mentions this hadith in Kitab al Majruhin.[1]
Ibrahim ibn ‘Abdullah ibn Khalid al Missisi is a kadhdhab (liar).
Ibn al Jawzi says, “This hadith is mawdu’ (fabricated). Ibrahim al Missisi is accused of fabricating it.”[2]
Al Dhahabi said, “This person is a kadhdhab (liar).”[3]
Al Suyuti mentions this version of the hadith in his work on fabrications.[4]
This chain of transmission is saqit (wholly unreliable).
Muhammad ibn ‘Awn Abu ‘Abdullah al Khurasani is not a thiqah (reliable). He is matruk al hadith (suspected of forgery in hadith).
I have yet to see anyone regard Abu al Hassan Ahmed ibn al Muzaffar ibn Ahmed al ‘Attar as a thiqah (reliable).
I could not trace the remaining narrators; they are five in total.
Al Suyuti mentions this hadith in his work on fabricated hadith.[6] Ibn ‘Iraq followed suit and mentioned this hadith in his work on fabricated hadith.[7]
Abu Bakr al Shafi’i narrates this version of the hadith with a chain of transmission that contains narrators that are mostly majhul (unknown).[8]
It contains the narrator ‘Ali ibn ‘Asim al Wasiti. Most hadith critics have regarded him as da’if (weak). Ibn Ma’in and Yazid ibn Harun deemed him a kadhdhab (liar). Imam Ahmed denied that he lied.
Ibn al Jawzi says, “This hadith is not authentic.”
Al Dhahabi says, “This hadith is batil (false).”[9]
Al Suyuti mentions this hadith in his work on fabrications.[10]
Ibn ‘Asakir narrates this version of the hadith with a chain of transmission that contains the narrator Abu ‘Abdullah al ‘Umari, Bishr ibn Dawood al Qurashi, and Mas’ud ibn Sabur.[11] I could not trace any of them.
Ibn ‘Asakir includes this hadith in Tarikh Dimashq — from Muhammad ibn Zakariyya al Ghalabi.[12] As mentioned previously, he is a kaddhab (liar).
Al Suyuti mentions this version of the hadith from Ibn ‘Asakir among the fabricated hadiths.[13] The defect he found in it was on account of al Ghalabi.
In short, the hadith is mawdu’ (fabricated) in all of its variant chains of transmission.
[1] Ibn Hibban: Kitab al Majruhin, 1/116.
[2] Ibn al Jawzi: al ‘Ilal al Mutanahiyah, 1/253.
[3] Al Dhahabi: Mizan al I’tidal, 1/41.
[4] Al Suyuti: al Ziyadat ‘ala al Mawdu’at, 1/286.
[5] Ibn al Najjar: Dhaykh Tarikh Baghdad, 17/153.
[6] Al Suyuti: al Ziyadat ‘ala al Mawdu’at, 1/283.
[7] Ibn ‘Iraq: Tanzih al Shari’ah, 1/406.
[8] Abu Bakr al Shafi’i: al Ghaylaniyyat, 1/63.
[9] Al Dhahabi: Talkhis al ‘Ilal, hadith no. 87.
[10] Al S uyuti: al Ziyadat ‘ala al Mawdu’at, 1/284.
[11] Ibn ‘Asakir: Tarikh Dimashq, 30/157-158.
[12] Ibid., 39/132.
[13] Al Suyuti: al Ziyadat ‘ala al Mawdu’at, 1/285-286.