UMS

BACK⇒ Return to Table of contents   The First Reaction: Outright denial of its existence in their books   A group of their scholars have taken the route of completely denying its existence in their books. One such scholar is ‘Abdul Hussain al Amini al Najafi, in his refutation of Ibn Hazm who attributes this preposterous belief to the Shia he says the following in his book al Ghadir:   […]

BACK⇒ Return to Table of contents   The Second Reaction: Acknowledging its Existence and Attempting to Give a Plausible Explanation   This acknowledgement has taken many forms. Hence one of their scholars has written a book wherein he acknowledges that there are some narrations which talk of the interpolation of the Qur’an but then further says:   إنها ضعيفة شاذة وأخبار آحاد لاتفيد علما ولاعملا، فإما أن تؤول بنحو من […]

BACK⇒ Return to Table of contents   The Third Reaction: Defiantly Proclaiming and Providing Evidence for it   The Person responsible for this catastrophe is Hussain al Nuri al Tabarsi (d. 1320) who wrote his book Fasl al Khitab in order to establish this alleged belief. Probably it was the first time in history that the fables of the Shia, the views of their scholars, and the fabricated verses which […]

BACK⇒ Return to Table of contents   The First Misconception   The heretic says:   الدليل الأول أن اليهود والنصاري غيروا وحرفوا كتاب نبيهم بعده، فهذه الأمة أيضا لا بد وأن يغيروا القرآن بعد نبينا صلي الله عليه وآله، لأن كل ما وقع في بني إسرائيل لا بد وأن يقع في هذه الأمة علي ما أخبر به الصادق المصدق صلوات الله عليه. The first proof is that the Jews and […]

BACK⇒ Return to Table of contents   The Forth Reaction: Overtly denying this Blasphemy whilst trying to prove it in Deceitful and Discreet Ways at the Same Time.   One of their contemporary scholars has embarked on denying this blasphemy overtly and defending the Book of Allah subhanahu wa ta ‘ala. You will, however, discern evil in the slips of his tongue and you will see falsehood discreetly inserted into […]