Whoever wants to see Adam in his knowledge … should look at ‘Ali
Whoever loves these two and their father will be with me on my level in Jannat
March 8, 2019Whoever obeys ‘Ali has obeyed me and whoever disobeys ‘Ali has disobeyed me
March 8, 2019BACK⇒ Return to Table of contents
Whoever wants to see Adam in his knowledge … should look at ‘Ali
من أراد أن ينظر إلى آدم في علمه … فلينظر إلى علي
Whoever wants to see Adam in his knowledge … should look at ‘Ali.
Al Albani declared it mawdu’.[1]
Hafiz al Dhahabi stated that the hadith is batil and Hafiz Ibn Hajar concurred.
Mis’ar ibn Yahya al Nahdi
- Al Dhahabi says, “Majhul. He narrated a batil narration.” This is the batil narration.[2]
Hafiz Ibn ‘Asakir says, “This is a shadh (munkar) hadith. There is more than just a majhul in it.”[3]
Al Suyuti and al Shawkani indicated that it is a concoction.[4]
The author of al Muraja’at claims that al Bayhaqi narrated it in his sahih.[5] First of all, al Bayhaqi did not author a book by the name of Sahih. He authored al Sunan al Kubra and Ma’rifat al Sunan wa al Athar. The deceitful only called it sahih to dupe people into believing that the hadith is sahih. He further claims that the hadith is found in Musnad Ahmed. He is an evil liar. Had this been the case, then why was it not documented by Hafiz al Haythami in Majma’ al Zawa’id and al Suyuti in his Jami’?
Next⇒ Whoever obeys ‘Ali has obeyed me and whoever disobeys ‘Ali has disobeyed me
[1] Silsilat al Ahadith al Da’ifah wa al Mawdu’ah vol. 10 pg. 545 Hadith: 4903.
[2] Mizan al I’tidal vol. 4 pg. 99; Lisan vol. 6 pg. 24.
[3] Tarikh Madinat Dimashq vol. 7 pg. 112; vol. 42 pg. 288.
[4] Al La’ali al Masnu’ah fi al Ahadith al Mawdu’ah vol. 1 pg. 325; al Fawa’id al Majmu’ah fi al Ahadith al Mawdu’ah vol. 1 pg. 367.
[5] Al Muraja’at pg. 179.
BACK⇒ Return to Table of contents
Whoever wants to see Adam in his knowledge … should look at ‘Ali
من أراد أن ينظر إلى آدم في علمه … فلينظر إلى علي
Whoever wants to see Adam in his knowledge … should look at ‘Ali.
Al Albani declared it mawdu’.[1]
Hafiz al Dhahabi stated that the hadith is batil and Hafiz Ibn Hajar concurred.
Mis’ar ibn Yahya al Nahdi
- Al Dhahabi says, “Majhul. He narrated a batil narration.” This is the batil narration.[2]
Hafiz Ibn ‘Asakir says, “This is a shadh (munkar) hadith. There is more than just a majhul in it.”[3]
Al Suyuti and al Shawkani indicated that it is a concoction.[4]
The author of al Muraja’at claims that al Bayhaqi narrated it in his sahih.[5] First of all, al Bayhaqi did not author a book by the name of Sahih. He authored al Sunan al Kubra and Ma’rifat al Sunan wa al Athar. The deceitful only called it sahih to dupe people into believing that the hadith is sahih. He further claims that the hadith is found in Musnad Ahmed. He is an evil liar. Had this been the case, then why was it not documented by Hafiz al Haythami in Majma’ al Zawa’id and al Suyuti in his Jami’?
Next⇒ Whoever obeys ‘Ali has obeyed me and whoever disobeys ‘Ali has disobeyed me
[1] Silsilat al Ahadith al Da’ifah wa al Mawdu’ah vol. 10 pg. 545 Hadith: 4903.
[2] Mizan al I’tidal vol. 4 pg. 99; Lisan vol. 6 pg. 24.
[3] Tarikh Madinat Dimashq vol. 7 pg. 112; vol. 42 pg. 288.
[4] Al La’ali al Masnu’ah fi al Ahadith al Mawdu’ah vol. 1 pg. 325; al Fawa’id al Majmu’ah fi al Ahadith al Mawdu’ah vol. 1 pg. 367.
[5] Al Muraja’at pg. 179.