BACK⇒ Return to Table of contents
إذا رأيتم معاوية على منبري فاقتلوه
This hadith is mawdu’ (forged). It has many chains of narration all of which are completely baseless. All scholars have rejected this hadith, including: Ayub al Sijastani[1], Imam Ahmed[2], Abu Zur’ah al Razi[3], Ibn Hibban[4], Ibn ‘Adi[5], al Dhahabi[6], Ibn Kathir[7], and many other great hadith scholars.
What is with the Shia? They try to use this hadith as proof despite the fact that Hassan radiya Llahu ‘anhu pledged his allegiance to Muawiyah radiya Llahu ‘anhu and relinquished his so-called “divine position” as you claim!
As long as you substantiate your claims with baseless ahadith, you should also accept the following (forged) hadith:
إذا رأيتم معاوية على منبري فاقبلوه فإنه أمين مأمون
If you see Muawiyah on my pulpit then accept; for he is trustworthy and reliable.
Especially since Imam al Suyuti said, “This narration is more sensible than the first.”[14]
[1] Ibn ‘Adi: al Kamil Fi Du’afa’ al Rijal 5/101
[2] Imam Ahmed: ‘Ilal al Khallal 138
[3] Abu Zur’ah al Razi: al Du’afa’ 2/ 472
[4] Ibn Hibban: Kitab al Majruhin. 1/157, 250; 2/172
[5] Ibn ‘Adi: al Kamil Fi Du’afa’ al Rijal 2/146, 209; 5/101, 200, 314; 7/83
[6] Imam al Dhahabi: Siyar A’lam al Nubala’ 3/150
[7] Ibn Kathir: al Bidayah wa al Nihayah 11/434
[8] Imam Bukhari: al Tarikh al Awsat 1/256
[9] Al ‘Uqayli: al Du’afa’ 1/259
[10] Al Juzaqani: al Abatil 1/200
[11] Ibn Taymiyyah: Minhaj al Sunnah al Nabawiyyah 4/380
[12] Ibn ‘Asakir: Tarikh Dimashq 59/155-158; Ibn al Jawzi: Kitab al Mawdu’at 2/24
[13] Al Albani: Silsilat al Da’ifah 4930
[14] Imam al Suyuti: al La’ali al Masnu’ah 1/ 389
BACK⇒ Return to Table of contents
إذا رأيتم معاوية على منبري فاقتلوه
This hadith is mawdu’ (forged). It has many chains of narration all of which are completely baseless. All scholars have rejected this hadith, including: Ayub al Sijastani[1], Imam Ahmed[2], Abu Zur’ah al Razi[3], Ibn Hibban[4], Ibn ‘Adi[5], al Dhahabi[6], Ibn Kathir[7], and many other great hadith scholars.
What is with the Shia? They try to use this hadith as proof despite the fact that Hassan radiya Llahu ‘anhu pledged his allegiance to Muawiyah radiya Llahu ‘anhu and relinquished his so-called “divine position” as you claim!
As long as you substantiate your claims with baseless ahadith, you should also accept the following (forged) hadith:
إذا رأيتم معاوية على منبري فاقبلوه فإنه أمين مأمون
If you see Muawiyah on my pulpit then accept; for he is trustworthy and reliable.
Especially since Imam al Suyuti said, “This narration is more sensible than the first.”[14]
[1] Ibn ‘Adi: al Kamil Fi Du’afa’ al Rijal 5/101
[2] Imam Ahmed: ‘Ilal al Khallal 138
[3] Abu Zur’ah al Razi: al Du’afa’ 2/ 472
[4] Ibn Hibban: Kitab al Majruhin. 1/157, 250; 2/172
[5] Ibn ‘Adi: al Kamil Fi Du’afa’ al Rijal 2/146, 209; 5/101, 200, 314; 7/83
[6] Imam al Dhahabi: Siyar A’lam al Nubala’ 3/150
[7] Ibn Kathir: al Bidayah wa al Nihayah 11/434
[8] Imam Bukhari: al Tarikh al Awsat 1/256
[9] Al ‘Uqayli: al Du’afa’ 1/259
[10] Al Juzaqani: al Abatil 1/200
[11] Ibn Taymiyyah: Minhaj al Sunnah al Nabawiyyah 4/380
[12] Ibn ‘Asakir: Tarikh Dimashq 59/155-158; Ibn al Jawzi: Kitab al Mawdu’at 2/24
[13] Al Albani: Silsilat al Da’ifah 4930
[14] Imam al Suyuti: al La’ali al Masnu’ah 1/ 389